COI term
Employers liability
Employers liability is the half of workers' comp that covers lawsuits over a workplace injury — including the case where a sub's injured worker sues you and you turn to the sub's policy.
Key takeaways
- Workers' comp has two halves: Part A pays the state's statutory injury benefits (no dollar limit), and Part B — employers liability covers lawsuits arising from a workplace injury. The certificate shows Part B's limits, not Part A's.
- It reaches you through the "action over" claim: a sub's injured employee, already paid by comp, sues you as the GC; you bring the sub in to cover it, and employers liability — plus your additional-insured status and the waiver — is what responds.
- The ACORD 25 shows three E.L. limits — E.L. Each Accident, E.L. Disease-Each Employee, E.L. Disease-Policy Limit. "Statutory" comp with blank or tiny E.L. figures is a gap; a common floor is $500,000 or $1,000,000 on each.
- The waiver of subrogation (WC 00 03 13) sits on this same policy. Require the E.L. limits and the waiver, and collect the endorsement, not just the certificate.
By the Sealinn team · 5 min read · Updated July 2026 · Written for general contractors
The two halves of workers' comp
A workers' compensation policy does two different jobs. Part A pays the state-mandated benefits when an employee is hurt on the job — medical and wage benefits, on a no-fault basis, with no dollar limit (the certificate just shows "statutory"). Part B — employers liability is different, and it is the number your requirements checklist should name: it covers the employer's legal liability when someone sues over a workplace injury, and it carries real dollar limits. Part A pays the injured worker; Part B defends against the lawsuit.
Why a GC cares about Part B
The exposure that should worry you is the "action over" (or third-party-over) claim. A sub's employee is injured on your site and collects workers' comp from the sub — then sues you, the general contractor, as a third party who allegedly contributed to the injury. You turn around and bring the sub in to indemnify you. Employers liability is the coverage on the sub's side that responds to that suit, working alongside your additional-insured status and the waiver of subrogation. Thin E.L. limits leave that whole chain underfunded.
"Statutory" isn't a number
The certificate's workers' comp line reads “statutory” for Part A — that's the benefits half, and it carries no limit at all. The numbers that matter to you are the three employers-liability boxes underneath it. Blank or unusually small E.L. figures are the gap, and the ACORD 25 will not tell you the policy behind them says anything different. Read the limits, then confirm the policy.
The three boxes, and what each one actually caps
They are printed as a stack of three and read as one number, which is a mistake, because they answer different claims and the two nobody reads are the ones that turn up later.
- E.L. Each Accident — the cap for a single accident, however many employees were hurt in it. This is the one everybody looks at, and the one a scaffold collapse or a trench failure runs into.
- E.L. Disease — Each Employee — the cap per employee for an occupational disease claim. Not an accident: a condition that developed over time. Silica, noise-induced hearing loss, solvent exposure, repetitive strain.
- E.L. Disease — Policy Limit — the aggregate for all disease claims in the policy period, across every employee. On a crew exposed to the same condition, this is the ceiling that matters and the one most likely to be exhausted by somebody else's job before your claim arrives.
The disease pair is where the late claims land, and on a certificate they are frequently identical to the each-accident figure because the policy was written to a standard package rather than to a risk. Worth reading all three rather than the first.
None of these three tells you how often this subcontractor's crew actually gets hurt — they are the ceilings the policy will pay, chosen when it was written. The number that describes their claims history is the experience modification rate, and it is not on the certificate at all.
Four states where Part B simply does not exist
This is the one that catches careful people, and it is entirely invisible from a certificate. In North Dakota, Ohio, Washington and Wyoming, workers' compensation is sold only by the state fund — private carriers cannot write it. And the state fund policy provides the statutory benefits and nothing else. There is no Part B. Employers liability is not thin on those policies; it is absent.
So a subcontract requiring "$1,000,000 employers liability" from a Washington subcontractor is requiring something their perfectly valid, fully compliant comp coverage does not contain and cannot be made to contain. The paperwork often does not look like a refusal either — state-fund coverage frequently arrives as the state's own certificate rather than an ACORD 25, so there is no E.L. row to be blank.
The remedy has a name: stop-gap employers liability, added by endorsement to the subcontractor's general liability policy, or occasionally written standalone. It fills exactly the hole the monopolistic fund leaves, and it is the thing to ask for by name. If you work across state lines at all, it is worth knowing which of your subs are in those four states before the question arrives as a claim.
What E.L. limits to require
- Adequate E.L. limits — a common floor is $1,000,000, or $500,000 each accident / $500,000 disease-each employee / $500,000 disease-policy limit. Set yours from your own upstream contract.
- The waiver of subrogation in your favor — endorsement WC 00 03 13 — on the same policy, so the sub's carrier can't recover from you after paying a claim.
- Watch for a claimed exemption. A sub operating under a workers' comp exemption has no Part A and no employers liability behind them — a separate exposure worth confirming.
- Ask for stop-gap where the sub is in North Dakota, Ohio, Washington or Wyoming. Their comp is a state-fund policy with no Part B at all, so the E.L. limit your contract asks for has to come from an endorsement on their general liability instead.
Copy-paste to the sub’s agent
Subject: Workers' comp + employers liability — [Sub name] on [Project]
Hi [Agent name], [Sub name] is working with us on [Project]. Please send a current ACORD 25 showing: 1) Workers' compensation with statutory limits, and 2) Employers liability limits (E.L. Each Accident / Disease-Each Employee / Disease-Policy Limit). We also require the waiver-of-subrogation endorsement, WC 00 03 13, showing it applies to [Your company] — please attach that endorsement, not just the certificate. Thanks, [Your name], [Your company]
Reading Part B, not just Part A
The workers' comp line reads “statutory” and tells you nothing, so Sealinn reads the three employers-liability figures underneath it and stores them with the rest of the certificate. There is no E.L. minimum to set. The each-accident figure is used only to answer “does this sub have workers' comp at all” — if your requirement set asks for comp and that box is empty, the certificate is blocked. The amount is never compared to anything, and the two disease limits are not checked at all. A $100,000 each-accident limit passes exactly as a $1,000,000 one does, which is worth knowing before you write a number into a subcontract and assume something is enforcing it.
Where this comes from
- NCCI — Countrywide workers' compensation forms and rules
- NCCI — Waiver of Our Right to Recover from Others Endorsement (WC 00 03 13)
- California Department of Industrial Relations — Division of Workers' Compensation FAQs — who must be covered
Read Part B as carefully as Part A.
Sealinn keeps every certificate's E.L. figures alongside the limits, so the numbers you have to read yourself are at least in one place.
